همزمانی چرخه‌های تجاری و یکپارچگی تجاری: مقایسه کشورهای D8، اتحادیه اروپا و جنوب شرق آسیا

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه اقتصاد دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 کارشناس ‌ارشد علوم ‌اقتصای‌ دانشکده ‌اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

در نظریه‌های اقتصاد بین‌الملل، بحث همزمانی چرخه‌های تجاری و عوامل اثرگذار بر آن با تأکید بر یکپارچگی تجاری جهت ایجاد و توسعه تجارت منطقه‌ای کشورها، اهمیت دارد. هدف این مقاله، ارزیابی عوامل اثرگذار بر همزمانی چرخه‌های تجاری به‌ویژه از بعد یکپارچگی تجاری، بین کشورهای اتحادیه اروپا، ASEAN و D8، با استفاده از داده‌های ترکیبی طی دوره زمانی 2013-2000 و مقایسه آن است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد شدت تجارت، تجارت درون صنعت و تجارت درون صنعت عمودی به عنوان شاخص‌های یکپارچگی تجاری در اتحادیه اروپا و ASEAN، اثر مثبت و معناداری بر همزمانی چرخه‌های تجاری دارد. همچنین در مورد کشورهای D8، اثر شدت تجارت و تجارت درون صنعت بر همزمانی چرخه‌های تجاری معنادار و دارای علامت مثبت هستند، در حالی ‌که تجارت درون صنعت عمودی معنادار نیست. علاوه‌براین مقایسه بین بلوک‌ها نشان می‌دهد که تجارت درون صنعت نسبت به شدت تجارت و تجارت درون صنعت عمودی، بیشترین اثر را بر همزمانی چرخه‌های تجاری دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Business Cycles Synchronization and Trade Integration: Comparison of D8, European Union and South East Asia Countrie

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Yazdani 1
  • Amin Gholami 2
1 Assistant Professor of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University (Corresponding Author)
2 MA in Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]

In theories of international economics, the issue of business cycles synchronization and its effective factors with emphasizing on trade integration is essential for regional trade creation and development among countries. The main purpose of this paper is evaluation and comparison of the effective factors on business cycles synchronization especially the role of trade integration among Euro Union, ASEAN and D8 countries using panel data for a period of 2000-2013. The results show that trade intensity, intra-industry trade and vertical intra-industry trade as indices of trade integration have a positive and significant effect in Europe and ASEAN. Also in D8 countries, the effect of trade intensity and intra-industry trade on business cycles synchronization is positive and significant, while vertical intra-industry trade is not effective. Moreover, the comparison among economic blocks shows that intra-industry trade relative to trade intensity and vertical intra-industry trade has more effect on business cycles synchronization.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Business Cycles Synchronization
  • Trade Integration
  • Trade Intensity
  • Intra-industry Trade
  • Vertical Intra-Industry Trade
- Adomaitis, K. (2004). How Does Trade Affect The Correlation of Business Cycle in EU Accession Countries? Working Paper 6(61).

- Afshari, Z. & Amini, T. (2012). Trade intensity and business cycle synchronization among ECO members. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 16(61), 81-111.

- Akin, C. (2006). Multiple Determinants of Business Cycle Synchronization. Paper Presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Economic Association, Montreal.

- Burns, A.F. & Mitchell, W.C. (1946). Measuring Business Cycle. NBER Books from National Bureau of Economic Research.

- Calderon, C. (2007). Trade, Specialization and Cycle Synchronization: Explaining Output Co-movement between Latin America, China and India. The World Bank.

- Calderon, C., Chong, A. & Stein, E. (2007). Trade Intensity and Business Cycle Synchronization: Are Developing Countries any Different? Journal of International Economics, 71, 2–21.

- Cerqueira, P. A. & Martins, R. (2009). Measuring the Determinants of Business Cycle Synchronization Using a Panel Approach. Economics Letters, 102, 106-108.

- Clogg, C.C., Petkova, E. & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical Methods for Comparing Regression Coefficients between Models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261-93.

- Drysdel, P. & Garnaut, R. (1993). The Pacific: An Application of General Theory of Economic Integration. in Bergsten, F.& Noland, M. (Editors), Pacific Dynamism and International Economic System, Institute for International Economics, Washington: Economics of Common Currencies, Allen and Unwin, 143-172.

- Drysdel, P. (1988). International Economic Pluralism, Economic Policy in East Asia and the Pacific. New York: Columbia University Press.

- Fichtner, F. (2003). Macroeconomic Synchronization in Europe: Analysis in an International Real Business Cycle Model. Koln University.

- Fontagné, L. & Freudenberg, M. (1997). Intra-Industry Trade: Methodological Issues Reconsidered. CEPII Working Paper 97/02.

- Frankel, J. A. & Rose, A. K. (1998). The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria. The Economic Journal, 108, 1009-1025.

- Fries, C. & Kappler, M. (2015). Does Foreign Direct Investment Synchronise Business Cycles? Results from a Panel Approach. Discussion Paper No. 15-031.

- Grubel, H. G. & Lioyd, P. J. (1975). Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. London, John Wiley & Sons.

- Gruben, W., Koo, J. & Millis, E. (2002). How Much Does International Trade Affect Business Cycle Synchronization. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Research Department, Working Paper, No. 0203.

- Hsu, C.C., Wu, J.Y. & Yau, R. (2011). Foreign Direct Investment and Business Cycle Co-movements: The Panel Data Evidence. Journal of Macroeconomics, 33, 770-783.

- Imbs, J. (2004). Trade, Finance, Specialization and Synchronization. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 723-734.

- Inklaar, R., Jong, R. & Haan, J. (2005). Trade and Business Cycle Synchronization in OECD Countries: A Re-Examination. CES Working Paper, No. 1546, Category 6: Monetary Policy and International Finance, September.

- Kandogan, Y. (2003). Intra-industry trade of transition countries: trends and determinants. Emerging Markets Review, 4(3), 273-286.

- Karimi, F. & Tayebi, S. K. (2010). Trade Integration and Business Cycles Synchronization with Emphasis on Regional Arrangements among OIC Nations. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 18(54), 123-146 (In Persian).

- Karimi, F., Pirasteh, H. & Tayebi, S.K. (2009). Assess the factors affecting the business cycle synchronization in the OIC. Journal of Economic Research, 9(4), 265-288 (In Persian).

- Kinfack, E.C. & Bonga-Bonga, L. (2015). Trade Linkages and Business Cycle Co-movement: An Empirical Analysis of Africa and its Main Trading Partners using Global VAR. ERSA Working Paper 512.

- Kleinert, J., Martin, J. & Toubal, F. (2015). The Few Leading the Many: Foreign Affiliates and Business Cycle Co-movement. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7(4), 134–159.

- Kose, M.A. & Yi, K.M. (2005). Can the Standard International Business Cycle Model Explain the Relation Between Trade and Co-movement? Working Paper No. 05-3, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

- Kose, M.A., Prasad, E.S. & Terrones, M.E. (2003). How Dose Globalization Affect the Synchronization of Business Cycles? American Economic Review, 93, 57-62.

- Krugman, P. (1993). Lessons of Massachusetts for EMU, in (F. Giavazzi and Torres, F. eds.) The Transition to Economic and Monetary Union in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231-61.

- Manteqi, Kh., Zeiqami, M.A. & Nouroozi, B. (2011). A Survey on Iran’s Foreign Trade flow and Its Synchronization of Business Cycles with Southwest Asian Countries. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 14(56), 33-58 (In Persian).

- Martincus, V. & Molinari, A. (2007). Regional Business Cycles and National Economic Borders: What Are the Effects of Trade in Developing Countries? Review of World Economics, 143(1), 140-178.

- McKinnon, R.I. (1963). Optimum Currency Areas. American Economic Review, 53(4), 717-725.

- Mink, M., Jacobs, J. & de Haan, J. (2007). Measuring synchronicity and co movement of business cycles with an application to the euro area. CESifo Working Paper 2112.

- Mundell, R. A. (1961). A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. American Economic Review, 51(4), 657-665.

- Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P. & Piquero, A. (1996). Using the Correct Statistical Test for The Equality of Regression Coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859-866.

- Pentecote, J-S., Poutineau, J-Ch. & Rondeau, F. (2013). Trade Integration and Business Cycle Synchronization in the EMU: The Negative Effect of New Trade Flows. University of Rennes.

- Rasekhi, S. (2008). Intra Industry Trade Measuring Methodology: A Case Study of Iran's Manufacturing Industry. Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat-e-Eghtesadi), 42(4), 61-84 (In Persian).

- Reinhart, C.M. & Rogoff, K.S. (2010). Growth in a Time of Debt. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 100, 573–578

- Saiki, A. & Kim, S.H. (2014). Business Cycle Synchronization and Vertical Trade Integration A case study of the Eurozone and East Asia. DNB Working Paper No. 407.

- Shin, K. & Wang, Y. (2004). Trade Integration and Business Cycle Synchronization in East Asia. ISER Discussion Paper, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, No. 574.

- Shin, K. & Sohn, Ch. (2006). Proliferating regional trade arrangements: Why and whither? World Economy, 29(12), 1649-1669.

- Shyegan, B. (2006). Business Cycle Synchronization of Iran with its Trade Partners. Economic Affairs Research Institute, 35-50 (In Persian).

- Teng, K.K. & Wai, C.C. (2004). Trade integration and business cycle synchronization: The case of India, China with ASEAN-5. Working Paper.

- Yeats, A. (1998). Does Mercosur Trade Performance Raise Concerns about the Effects of Regional Trade Arrangements? The World Bank Economic Review, 12(1), 1-28.