اثر تمرکز صنعتی بر کارایی انرژی در بخش صنعت ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری اقتصاد دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و تربیتی دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 دکتری اقتصاد دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اجتماعی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اداری دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

چکیده

یکی از مسائل اصلی توسعه بخش صنعت، افزایش کارایی انرژی برای بهبود کیفیت محیط زیست است. در این راستا، مطالعه حاضر با استفاده از شواهد آماری بخش صنعت براساس کدهای آیسیک دو رقمی برای دوره زمانی 1386 تا 1394 به برآورد کارایی انرژی در زیر بخش‌های صنعت و اثر تمرکز صنعتی بر آن می‌پردازد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که کارایی انرژی در گروه بازیافت در کمترین مقدار برابر با 01/0 و در گروه تولید سایر محصولات کانی غیر فلزی در بیشترین مقدار برابر با 78/0 است. همچنین گروه‌های محصولات فلزی فابریکی (کد 28)، کانی غیر فلزی (کد 26) و غذایی و آشامیدنی (کد 15) دارای کمترین تمرکز صنعتی برابر با 031/0 است و گروه ساخت ماشین آلات دفتری، حسابداری و محاسباتی (کد 30) دارای بیشترین تمرکز، برابر با 394/0 است.  نتایج برآورد الگو توبیت نشان می‌دهد که تمرکز صنعتی، اثر منفی و معناداری بر کارایی انرژی دارد، و مخارج تحقیق و توسعه، قیمت انرژی و سرمایه انسانی اثر مثبت و معناداری بر کارایی انرژی دارد. تخصیص مخارج تحقیق و توسعه در جهت شناخت فرآیندهای نوین تولیدی، بهبود کیفیت سرمایه انسانی و توزیع فعالیت‌های صنعتی در استان‌ها براساس مزیت نسبی از جمله سیاست‌های موثر برای افزایش کارایی انرژی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Industrial Concentration on Energy Efficiency in Iranian Industrial Sector

نویسندگان [English]

  • Younes Goli 1
  • Leila Argha 2
  • Yousef Mehnatfar 3
1 Ph.D in Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Ph.D in Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
چکیده [English]

One of the key issues in the development of the industrial sector is to increase energy efficiency to improve the quality of the environment. On this issue, the study uses industrial sector data of two-digit ISIC codes for the period of 2007-2015 to estimate energy efficiency of sub-sectors of industry and evaluates the effect of industrial concentration on it. The results show that recycling has lowest energy efficiency equals to 0.01 and Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products has highest energy efficiency which is equal to 0.78. Also, the Manufacture of fabricated metal products, Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products and Manufacture of food products and beverages have lowest spatial concentration index equal to 0.031 and Manufacture of office, accounting and computing machinery in highest level is 0.394. The results of the Tobit estimation show that industrial concentration has negative effect on energy efficiency, and R&D expenditure, energy prices and human capital have a positive and effect on energy efficiency. The allocations of R&D expenditures to identify novel production processes, improve the quality of human capital and distributing industrial activities in provinces basic on relative advantages are effective policies to increase energy efficiency.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Tobit
  • Industrial Concentration
- Arabmazar, A., & Khosravi, A. (2018). Industrial Energy Productivity Disparities by Iran Provinces. Quarterly Journal of Energy Policy and Planning Research, 4(10), 41-66. (In persian)
- Bhadbhade, N., Yilmaz, S., Zuberi, J. S., Eichhammer, W., & Patel, M. K. (2020). The evolution of energy efficiency in Switzerland in the period 2000–2016. Energy, 191, 116526.‏
- Brülhart, M., & Mathys, N. A. (2008). Sectoral agglomeration economies in a panel of European regions. Regional Science and Urban Economics38(4), 348-362.‏
- Chen, C., Huang, J., Chang, H., & Lei, H. (2019). The effects of indigenous R&D activities on China's energy intensity: A regional perspective. Science of The Total Environment689, 1066-1078.‏
- Chen, D., Chen, S., & Jin, H. (2018). Industrial agglomeration and CO2 emissions: Evidence from 187 Chinese prefecture-level cities over 2005–2013. Journal of cleaner production172, 993-1003.‏
- Dong, K., Sun, R., Hochman, G., & Li, H. (2018). Energy intensity and energy conservation potential in China: a regional comparison perspective. Energy155, 782-795.‏
- Ebadi Z, hosseinpour F, hallafi H, saeidi N. (2018). Investigating the Effect of Oil and Gas Resources Abundance on Energy Efficiency in Rentier States. Quarterly Energy Economics Review. 14 (57) :201-234. (In Persian).
- Fathi, B., Khodaparast, M., Homayonifar, M., & Sajjadifar, H. (2019). Presentation of Energy Efficiency Model in Iranian Economy Using Dynamic Optimization Approach. Quarterly Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran (AESI), 8(29), 97-121 (In Persian).
- Goli, Y., & Safari, M. (2016). Estimation of Energy Efficiency and Factor Affecting on it’s in Iran Province (Tobit approach), Economic Research Journal of Rahbord, 5(17), 107-127 (In Persian).
- He, Y., Liao, N., & Zhou, Y. (2018). Analysis on provincial industrial energy efficiency and its influencing factors in China based on DEA-RS-FANN. Energy142, 79-89.‏
- Kafaie, M., & khosravi, A. (2016). Energy efficiency in Iran’s provincial with stochastic frontier production function method. Quarterly Energy Economics Review, 12(50), 101-128 (In Persian).
- Kafaie, M., & Nejadaghaeianvash, P. (2016). Estimation and Comparison of Energy Efficiency in Iran’s Economic Sectors. Journal of Economics and Modeling, 7(27), 97-122 (In Persian).
- Kafaie, S.M.A., & Nejadaghaeianvash, P. (2017). Identifying the Factors that Effect Sectoral Energy Efficiency in the Iranian Economy. Quarterly Energy Economics Review, 13 (52),1-34 (In Persian).
- Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom: an inaugural lecture. Cambridge University Press.
- Karimi Takanlo, Z., Sadeghi, K., porabdollahian, M., & Mousavian, M. (2017). An Appraisal of Spatial club convergence of Iran’s province-level industrial energy efficiency. Quarterly Energy Economics Review. 12 (51) :151-179 (In Persian).
- Kopidou, D., Tsakanikas, A., & Diakoulaki, D. (2016). Common trends and drivers of CO2 emissions and employment: a decomposition analysis in the industrial sector of selected European Union countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4159-4172.
- Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of political economy99(3), 483-499.
- Li, H., & Shi, J. F. (2014). Energy efficiency analysis on Chinese industrial sectors: an improved Super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. Journal of cleaner production65, 97-107.
- Li, M. J., He, Y. L., & Tao, W. Q. (2017). Modeling a hybrid methodology for evaluating and forecasting regional energy efficiency in China. Applied Energy185, 1769-1777.‏
- Lin, B., & Long, H. (2015). A stochastic frontier analysis of energy efficiency of China's chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production87, 235-244.
- Lin, B., & Wang, X. (2014). Exploring energy efficiency in China׳ s iron and steel industry: A stochastic frontier approach. Energy Policy72, 87-96.
- Lin, B., & Yang, L. (2013). The potential estimation and factor analysis of China′ s energy conservation on thermal power industry. Energy Policy62, 354-362.
- Liu, J., Cheng, Z., & Zhang, H. (2017). Does industrial agglomeration promote the increase of energy efficiency in China? Journal of Cleaner Production164, 30-37.
- Liu, W., & Lin, B. (2018). Analysis of energy efficiency and its influencing factors in China's transport sector. Journal of Cleaner Production170, 674-682.
- Mahmoudzadeh, M., Sadeghi, S., & Sadeghi, S. (2013). The investigating of industries Characteristic on Energy Intensity in Iranian Producing Industries. Journal of Economics and Modeling, 3(11-12), 174-191.(in Persian)
- Mehrabi, S., & davoodi, S.M.R. (2019). Prediction of Efficiency and Factors Affecting Energy Use in the Framework of a Dynamics Model System: A Case Study of Mostazafan Foundation Owned Petrochemical Companies. Quarterly Energy Economics Review, 14(59), 185-211.
- Mehregan, N., Fotros, M.H., Gholizadeh, A.A., & Teymourei, Y. (2016). Estimating Spatial Concentration of Industry and Effective Factors on It Between Provinces of Iran. Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 6 (24),7-40. (In Persian).
- Metcalf, G.E. (2008). an empirical analysis of energy intensity and its determinants at the state level, Energy Journal, 29(3), 1-26.
- Nazemi, A., Karimi, F., Mamipoor, S., & Feshari,  M.(2019). Energy Efficiency in Iran Provinces: DEA Approach. Quarterly Journal of Energy Policy and Planning Research, 5(14), 103-142.
- Otsuka, A., & Goto, M. (2015). Estimation and determinants of energy efficiency in Japanese regional economies. Regional Science Policy & Practice7(2), 89-101.
- Ouyang, X., Wei, X., Sun, C., & Du, G. (2018). Impact of factor price distortions on energy efficiency: Evidence from provincial-level panel data in China. Energy policy118, 573-583.‏
- ShahabiNejad, V. (2016). Comparative analysis of the energy efficiency of Iran province's large industries using data envelopment analysis in the period 2008-2011. Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 4(16), 157-178.  (in Persian).
- Shahabinejad, V. (2016). Measuring Total-factor energy efficiency and energy saving potential in Asian economies: application of Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Quarterly Energy Economics Review. 12 (49), 201-224. (In Persian).
- Shahnazi, R., & dehghan shabani, Z. (2016). Effects of Transportation Infrustructure on Industrial Activities ‎Concentration in Iranian Provinces, Journal of Economic Research, 51(4), 887-908. (In Persian).
- Shen, N., Zhao, Y., & Wang, Q. (2018). Diversified Agglomeration, Specialized Agglomeration, and Emission Reduction Effect—A Nonlinear Test Based on Chinese City Data. Sustainability10(6), 2002.
- Wang, H. N., & Chen, Y. Y. (2010). Industrial Agglomeration and Industrial Energy Efficiency: Empirical Analyses Based on 25 Industries in China [J]. Journal of Finance and Economics9, 69-79.
- Wang, J. M., Shi, Y. F., & Zhang, J. (2017). Energy efficiency and influencing factors analysis on Beijing industrial sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production167, 653-664.
- Wang, J., & Zhao, T. (2017). Regional energy-environmental performance and investment strategy for China's non-ferrous metals industry: a non-radial DEA based analysis. Journal of cleaner production163, 187-201.
- Wang, J.M., Shi, Y. F., & Zhang, J. (2017). Energy efficiency and influencing factors analysis on Beijing industrial sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production167, 653-664.
- Xiaoli, Z., Rui, Y., & Qian, M. (2014). China's total factor energy efficiency of provincial industrial sectors. Energy, 65, 52-61.
- Xie, C., Bai, M., & Wang, X. (2018). Accessing provincial energy efficiencies in China’s transport sector. Energy Policy123, 525-532.
- Xiong, S., Ma, X., & Ji, J. (2019). The impact of industrial structure efficiency on provincial industrial energy efficiency in China. Journal of cleaner production215, 952-962.
- Zhang, N., Zhou, P., & Choi, Y. (2013). Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: A meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function analysis. Energy Policy56, 653-662.
- Zhao, H., & Lin, B. (2019). Will agglomeration improve the energy efficiency in China’s textile industry: Evidence and policy implications? Applied energy237, 326-337.‏
- Zheng, Q., & Lin, B. (2018). Impact of industrial agglomeration on energy efficiency in China’s paper industry. Journal of cleaner production184, 1072-1080.‏
- Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., & Zhou, D.Q. (2012). Measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance: a parametric frontier approach. Applied Energy90(1), 196-200.